Skip to main content

Table 2 Multilevel regressions testing the relationship between Time and Condition to Verbal EC to virtual patients

From: The impact of scaffolded and non-scaffolded suicidal virtual human interaction training on clinician emotional self-awareness, empathic communication, and clinical efficacy

Variable

B

SE

P

95% CI

Fixed Effects

   (Intercept)

2.46

0.41

<0.001

[1.65, 3.28]

   Clinician Age

-0.002

0.01

0.816

[-0.02, 0.02]

   Cisgender Woman

0.36

0.12

0.004

[0.12, 0.60]

   Clinician Degree: Staff MD/DO

-0.07

0.20

0.720

[-0.46, 0.32]

   Clinician Degree: Staff Psychologist

-0.05

0.25

0.842

[-0.54, 0.44]

   Clinician Degree: MSW/MHC/MFT

0.07

0.29

0.811

[-0.50, 0.65]

   Clinician Degree: Trainee Psychiatrist

0.06

0.21

0.786

[-0.36, 0.47]

   Clinician Degree: Trainee Psychologist

-0.05

0.22

0.840

[-0.49, 0.41]

   Clinician Degree: Masters Clinician

-0.66

0.31

0.038

[-1.28, -0.04]

   Clinician Degree: Other

0.05

0.27

0.838

[-0.49, 0.58]

   ECCS: Number of Opportunities

-0.03

0.01

<0.001

[-0.05, -0.02]

   ECCS: Duration of Interaction

0.02

0.01

0.042

[0.001, 0.04]

   Study Condition - Non-Scaffolded

-0.11

0.19

0.544

[-0.49, 0.26]

   Time - T2

0.53

0.16

0.002

[0.20, 0.85]

Time - T3

0.60

0.17

<0.001

[0.25, 0.94]

   Non-Scaffolded x T2

-0.51

0.23

0.026

[-0.96, -0.06]

   Non-Scaffolded x T3

-0.33

0.23

0.160

[-0.79, 0.13]

Random Effects

   \(\tau _{00,subject}\)

0.03

   

   \(\sigma ^{2}\)

0.31

   

   \(N_{subject}\)

52

   

   Observations

143

   

   Deviance

251.1

   
  1. Results that are statistically significant are highlighted in bold