From: Sustainability in quality improvement (SusQI): a case-study in undergraduate medical education
Factors that enabled learning | 1. Interactivity and Participation | 1.1 Role of Hub technology |
1.2 Engaging in critical discussions with peers | ||
2. Content | 2.1 Pitched at the right level | |
2.2 Balance between shock and hope | ||
3. Real-life | 3.1 Relevance to practice | |
3.2 Examples of achievable projects by near peers | ||
Suggestions for improvement | 4. Additional support outside of the teaching session | 4.1 Having resources for action |
4.2 Balance ‘ready-to-go’ project ideas with student choice | ||
5. Adapting the teaching structure to suit student needs | 5.1 Curricular positioning and emphasis | |
5.2 More interactivity | ||
5.3 More than one session | ||
5.4 Sustainability integrated consistently across the curriculum |