Skip to main content

Table 2 Factors associated with three types of burnout: univariable models

From: Workplace resources, mentorship, and burnout in early career physician-scientists: a cross sectional study in Japan

 

Personal burnouta

Work-related burnouta

Patient-related burnouta

Estimate

SE

P

Estimate

SE

P

Estimate

SE

P

Individual factor

 Female

5.20 (0.54, 9.87)

2.37

0.029

1.27 (−2.77, 5.31)

2.05

0.537

1.00 (−3.09, 5.09)

2.08

0.630

Age, years

 37 - vs. <  37

1.82 (−2.29, 5.93)

2.09

0.385

1.89 (−1.65, 5.42)

1.80

0.294

5.30 (1.75, 8.84)

1.80

0.004

 Doctor of Medical Science

1.94 (−2.61, 6.49)

2.31

0.400

0.43 (−3.49, 4.34)

1.99

0.831

1.98 (−1.98, 5.94)

2.02

0.330

 Board certified specialist

−2.30 (−9.60, 5.01)

3.72

0.540

2.76 (−3.55, 9.06)

3.21

0.300

−0.74 (−7.12, 5.63)

3.24

0.820

 Specialty vs. Public Health or Basic medicine

  

0.556

  

0.442

  

0.378

 Surgery

4.51 (−1.94, 10.96)

3.28

0.170

3.92 (−1.63, 9.46)

2.82

0.166

3.13 (−2.48, 8.74)

2.86

0.274

 Internal Medicine

4.23 (−2.23, 10.69)

3.29

0.199

3.90 (−1.65,9.46)

2.83

0.168

4.01 (−1.62, 9.63)

2.86

0.162

 Other clinical departments

3.06 (−5.48, 11.59)

4.34

0.481

5.44 (−1.90,12.78)

3.73

0.146

6.25 (−1.18, 13.68)

3.78

0.100

 Married

−2.96 (−8.84, 2.92)

2.99

0.320

−4.78 (−9.82, 0.27)

2.57

0.064

−1.90 (−7.03, 3.23)

2.61

0.470

Amount of Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists ×100 US$(1$ = 100JPY)

 377 - vs. <  377

−1.77 (−5.85, 2.31)

2.07

0.395

−2.59 (−6.10, 0.91)

1.78

0.147

−3.20 (−6.74, 0.35)

1.80

0.077

 Research type vs. social sciences in medicine/others

  

0.735

  

0.162

  

0.417

 Basic medicine

3.42 (−5.36,12.22)

4.47

0.443

6.78 (−0.78, 14.33)

3.84

0.079

3.89 (−3.80, 11.59)

3.92

0.321

 Clinical medicine

2.73 (−6.18, 11.64)

4.53

0.547

4.73 (−2.93, 12.40)

3.90

0.225

1.88 (−5.92, 9.69)

3.97

0.635

 Average of weekly working hours

0.05 (−0.06, 0.17)

0.06

0.370

0.11 (0.01, 0.20)

0.05

0.037

0.01 (−0.09, 0.11)

0.05

0.860

 Household income US$(1$ = 100JPY) vs. < 100,000

  

0.704

  

0.236

  

0.835

  ≥ 200,000

−3.23 (−10.77, 4.30)

3.83

0.399

−5.09 (−11.59, 1.40)

3.31

0.124

0.44 (−6.19, 7.06)

3.37

0.897

 150,000-200,000

−2.21 (−8.88, 4.46)

3.39

0.515

−5.85 (11.61, −0.09)

2.93

0.046

−0.40 (−6.27, 5.47)

2.99

0.893

 100,000–150,000

−3.58 (−9.74, 2.58)

3.13

0.253

−4.53 (−9.84, 0.79)

2.70

0.095

−1.67 (−7.09, 3.74)

2.75

0.544

 Mentor

−6.89 (−10.97, −2.81)

2.08

0.001

−6.72 (−10.21, −3.22)

1.78

0.000

−5.40 (−8.95, − 1.85)

1.81

0.003

Workplace Resourcesb

 Organizational climatec

−0.82 (− 1.57, − 0.08)

0.38

0.031

− 0.89 (− 1.53, − 0.25)

0.32

0.007

−0.74 (− 1.40, − 0.08)

0.33

0.028

 Well-Being consultation servicesd

− 1.10 (− 1.72, − 0.48)

0.31

0.001

−1.08 (− 1.61, − 0.55)

0.27

<.0001

−0.61 (− 1.15, − 0.06)

0.28

0.030

 A role modele

−7.06 (− 11.16, − 2.30)

2.08

0.001

−5.82 (− 9.35, − 2.29)

1.80

0.001

− 4.54 (− 8.14, − 0.94)

1.83

0.014

  1. aEach item was answered using a five-point Likert scale scoring: Always for 100, Often for 75, Sometimes for 50, Seldom for 25, and Never/almost never for 0. Total score on the scale is the average of the scores on the items (i.e., total score of each subscale is 100). bWorkplace Resources was asked starting with “Does your workplace have the following conditions....?” and response patterns were based on a five point Likert scale from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree.’ cOrganizational climate includes the presence of actions to promote gender equity and presence of career education. dWell-being consultation services measures if the workplace has an expert or a division for consultation on “career and work”, “research”, “harassment”, and/or “mental health”. eThe item measures if the workplace has a role model who can keep a perceived good balance of career and personal life and divided into a binary variable (agree vs. either “do not know” or “disagree”).