1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Mean | SD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authenticity of patient encounter and the consultation | ||||||||
While working on this case, I felt I had to make the same decisions a doctor would make in real life. | 3 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3.12 | 1.17 |
While working on this case, I felt I were the doctor caring for this patient. | 1 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2.85 | 0.82 |
Professional approach in the consultation | ||||||||
While working through this case, I was actively engaged in gathering the information (e.g., history questions, physical exams, lab tests) I needed, to characterize the patient’s problem. | 4 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3.06 | 1.15 |
While working through this case, I was actively engaged in revising my initial image of the patient’s problem as new information became available. | 2 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3.48 | 1.16 |
While working through this case, I was actively engaged in creating a short summary of the patient’s problem using medical terms. | 6 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 3.33 | 1.43 |
While working through this case, I was actively engaged in thinking about which findings supported or refuted each diagnosis in my differential diagnosis. | 1 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 3.64 | 1.04 |
Coaching during consultation | ||||||||
I felt that the case was at the appropriate level of difficulty for my level of training. | 0 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 3.58 | 0.92 |
The questions I was asked while working through this case were helpful in enhancing my diagnostic reasoning in this case. | 0 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 10 | 0 | 4.15 | 0.70 |
The feedback I received was helpful in enhancing my diagnostic reasoning in this case. | 0 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 4.21 | 0.73 |
Learning effect of consultation | ||||||||
After completing this case, I feel better prepared to confirm a diagnosis and exclude differential diagnoses in a real life patient with this complaint. | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 4.27 | 0.75 |
After completing this case I feel better prepared to care for a real life patient with this complaint. | 0 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 4.00 | 0.85 |
Overall judgment of case workup | ||||||||
Overall, working through this case was a worthwhile learning experience. | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 4.58 | 0.6 |
Special strengths of the case: Video footage illustrated investigation very closely; Individual speed; Well structured, detaileled; interesting cases; multimedia presentation, Clear structure; real pictures; Detailed explanation of the basics; multiple editing possible, understandable, supported with images; good portioning of content in “learning packages” | ||||||||
Special weaknesses of the case: In the answers, the individual feedback should be shown directly; Staging and CT findings overstraining; processing time too short |