Skip to main content

Table 2 Data description according to CTT

From: Item pre-knowledge true prevalence in clinical anatomy - application of gated item response theory model

Year

Period

N

Reused

(N)

Difficultya,c

Mean (SD)

Discriminationb,c

Mean (SD)

Cronbach’s Alpha

ωh

ωt

2008

1

217

0

0.57 (0.18)

0.37 (0.19)

0.88

0.46

0.89

2

123

4

0.63 (0.20)

0.32 (0.17)

0.86

0.51

0.87

2009

1

208

13

0.66 (0.20)

0.34 (0.13)

0.88

0.48

0.88

2

113

6

0.64 (0.21)

0.37 (0.16)

0.89

0.38

0.90

2010

1

192

26

0.64 (0.20)

0.30 (0.14)

0.86

0.44

0.87

2

116

13

0.59 (0.21)

0.32 (0.15)

0.87

0.41

0.88

2011

1

243

21

0.62 (0.22)

0.37 (0.17)

0.89

0.56

0.90

2

48

14

0.59 (0.20)

0.37 (0.19)

0.90

0.36

0.91

  1. a% of students who correctly answered the item
  2. b Biserial correlation between the item and the number of correct answers to the other items
  3. c To assess whether there were significant differences between the examinations, in the difficulty and discrimination indexes, mixed effect models were used with a fixed factor (examination) and the item-level random intercept to account for the residual correlation within the same (reused) items