Skip to main content

Table 2 Teacher feedback (Median (IQR)

From: Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial

Feedback parameters

SNAPPS group

Control group

P value*

Concisely covered all aspects of history taking

4 (4–5)

4 (2–5)

0.039

Performed all the steps of general examination

4 (4–5)

4 (2–4)

< 0.01

Systemic examination findings were relevant and in accordance with history

4 (4–5)

4 (3–4)

< 0.01

Sequencing and formulation of differential diagnosis were well organized

4 (2–4)

2 (1–4)

< 0.01

Hypothesis of differential diagnosis matching with history and examination

4 (2–4)

1 (1–2)

< 0.01

Able to speak out all the difficulties faced while case discussion

4 (4–5)

2 (2–4)

< 0.01

Narration of patient management plan – realistic and appropriate to differential diagnosis

5 (4–5)

4 (3–4)

< 0.01

Identified sufficient case based learning issues for self study

4 (4–5)

2 (1–4)

< 0.01

Time management during case presentations

5 (4–5)

3 (2–4)

< 0.01

Uniformity and skills of presentation

4 (4–4)

4 (3–4)

0.138

Overall rating of case presentation (Mean ± SD)

6.7 ± 1.46

5.3 ± 1.75

t = 3.20**

p = 0.002

  1. * Mann-Whitney U test
  2. ** Student t test