From: Development of a self-assessment teamwork tool for use by medical and nursing students
Item | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
---|---|---|
2. Each team member had a clear role | 0.791 | 0.230 |
6. A plan for treatment was communicated to the team | 0.754 | 0.275 |
5. When team members received instructions they closed the communication loop | 0.720 | 0.251 |
4. Instructions and verbal communications were directed | 0.706 | 0.194 |
1. An overview of the situation was maintained | 0.676 | 0.211 |
15. Suggestions were invited from within the team when problem-solving | 0.151 | 0.796 |
14. Team members offered assistance to one other | 0.277 | 0.775 |
13. Team members sought assistance from each other | 0.362 | 0.748 |
12. Situational information was verbalised | 0.209 | 0.646 |
3. Instructions were explicit a | 0.584 | 0.402 |
7. Priorities and orders of actions were communicated to the team a | 0.745 | 0.390 |
8. Possible future developments or requirements were communicated clearly a | 0.693 | 0.380 |
9. Questions, input, or requests for clarification were responded to appropriately a | 0.519 | 0.439 |
10. When expressions of concern were raised and not responded to appropriately, team members persisted in seeking a response, or took action a | 0.596 | 0.426 |
11. Important clinical actions were verbalised a | 0.445 | 0.627 |