| CAID of the subscales | CAID of the questionnaire | |
---|---|---|---|
1-Educational Program (EP) | |||
1 | The contents I teach to my students are relevant to the intended learning outcomes of the curriculum (e.g., doctor as a professional, leader, communicator, researcher, etc.). | .59 | .89 |
2 | In my institution, the content taught in one course/module helps the students to understand the related concepts in other courses/modules. | .62 | .89 |
3 | The curricular content taught in my institution contributes to making students good doctors. | .64 | .89 |
4 | I use different assessment tools to assess knowledge, skills, and attitude in a course. | .62 | .89 |
5 | I construct assessment items according to the blueprinting for an exam. | .75 | .90 |
6 | I provide regular constructive feedback to my students. | .62 | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .69 | ||
2-Disciplinary cultures (DC) | |||
7 | The attendance of faculty on campus is strictly monitored through biometric thumb impressions. | – | .89 |
8 | Students are fined if they do not adhere to institution policies. | – | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .41 | ||
3-Social interaction (SI) | |||
9 | My institution offers formal opportunities for enhancing social interaction on educational issues among students. | .50 | .89 |
10 | My institution provides interactive online discussion forums. | .58 | .89 |
11 | My institution has meeting places for students and teachers for interaction. | .65 | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .67 | ||
4-Institutional policies (IP) | |||
12 | Faculty can appeal against institutional decisions without any fear. | .70 | .89 |
13 | My institution’s decisions are based on defined policies and procedures. | .67 | .89 |
14 | I have been provided with a clear job description. | .70 | .89 |
15 | My institution gives awards for educational innovation (e.g., development of a new assessment tool, teaching method etc.). | .72 | .89 |
16 | My teaching and research activities are considered equally important for my promotion. | .75 | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .75 | ||
5-Communication Practices (CP) | |||
17 | In my institution, there are no restrictions on the use of social media such as YouTube, WhatsApp etc. for educational purposes. | .74 | .89 |
18 | In my institution, regular faculty meetings are held at departmental level where everyone has the right to voice their concerns. | .68 | .89 |
19 | In my institution, the curriculum managers clearly communicate educational changes to the faculty. | .72 | .89 |
20 | In my institution, the faculty share strategies for effective classroom management among themselves. | .67 | .89 |
21 | In my institution, the faculty share their experiences of various instructional designs (e.g., 4C ID, Gagne 9 events) amongst them. | .69 | .89 |
22 | My institutional management shares the educational courses/modules in the curriculum with the faculty. | .68 | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .73 | ||
6-Faculty involvement (FI) | |||
23 | I am invited to the meetings in which curricular issues are discussed and decisions are made. | .53 | .89 |
24 | My suggestions to update a course/module are given due consideration by committees that make curricular changes. | .46 | .88 |
25 | I have the authority to update the content of course/module in the curriculum. | .77 | .89 |
Cronbach alpha of the subscale | .68 | ||
Overall internal consistency of the questionnaire | .89 |