Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of effectiveness of this course with teachers, graduate students and organizational factors (n = 440)

From: Evaluation of factors influencing the guide to read biomedical English literature course for Chinese new medical postgraduates—a multiple regression analysis

Measures

Teaching effectiveness

χ2

P

Yes (n, %)

No (n, %)

Teachers factors

 Knowledge level

  High

390(92.9)

9(45.0)

46.236

0.000

  Medium

30(7.1)

11(55.0)

  

 Teaching style

  High

297(70.7)

8(40.0)

12.419

0.002

  Medium

116(27.6)

10(50.0)

  

  Poor

7(1.7)

2(10.0)

  

 Individualized teaching

  High

248(59.0)

6(30.0)

17.644

0.000

  Medium

159(37.9)

10(50.0)

  

  Poor

13(3.1)

4(20.0)

  

 Logical teaching

  High

333(79.5)

14(70.0)

2.422

0.298

  Medium

83(19.8)

5(25.0)

  

  Poor

3(0.7)

1(5.0)

  

 Heuristic teaching

  High

279(66.4)

3(15.0)

43.515

0.000

  Medium

128(30.5)

11(55.0)

  

  Poor

13(3.1)

6(30.0)

  

 Literature difficulty

  High

84(20.0)

6(25.0)

1.256

0.534

  Medium

242(57.6)

10(45.0)

  

  Poor

94(22.4)

4(30.0)

  

 Bilingual teaching

  Chinese

80(19.3)

3(15.0)

0.231

0.631

  Chinese-English

334(80.7)

17(85.0)

  

Student factors

 Gender

  Male

179(97.3)

241(94.1)

2.436

0.119

  Female

5(2.1)

15(5.9)

  

 Attitude toward Studying

  Positive

411(97.4)

11(55.0)

78.781

0.000

  Negative

9(2.1)

9(45.0)

  

 Times of preview

   < 1 time

3(0.7)

14(70.0)

86.431

0.000

  1 time

94(22.4)

3(15.0)

  

  2~3 times

301(71.7)

3 (15.0)

  

   > 3 times

20(4.8)

0(0)

  

 English level

  CET 4

80(19.0)

4(20.0)

0.011

0.916

  CET 6

340(81.0)

16(80.0)

  

Organizational factors

 Management

  High

264(63.0)

7(35.0)

6.608

0.037

  Medium

141(33.7)

11(55.0)

  

  Poor

14(3.3)

2(10.0)

  
  1. Note: all of the results were used continuity correction of Chi-Square Tests