Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of participants and homogeneity tests between the experimental and control groups (N = 42)

From: Effects of an evidence-based practice education program using multifaceted interventions: a quasi-experimental study with undergraduate nursing students

Variables

Characteristics

Experimental Group (n = 22)

n (%)

Control Group (n = 22)

n (%)

χ2 or t

p value

Gender

Female

22 (100.0)

22 (100.0)

Age (yr)

≤24

22 (100.0)

20 (90.9)

0.488

≥25

0

2 (9.1)

Mean ± SD

22.82 ± 0.40

23.18 ± 0.85

Religion

Yes

7 (31.8)

10 (45.5)

0.86

0.353

No

15 (68.2)

12 (54.5)

Satisfaction with nursing major

Very satisfied

1 (4.5)

1 (4.5)

5.21a

0.090

Satisfied

15 (68.2)

8 (36.4)

Neutral

6 (27.3)

12 (54.5)

Dissatisfied

0

1 (4.5)

Very dissatisfied

0

0

Satisfaction with clinical practice

Very satisfied

0

1 (4.5)

6.07a

0.123

Satisfied

10 (45.5)

4 (18.2)

Neutral

11 (50.0)

12 (54.5)

Dissatisfied

1 (4.5)

4 (18.2)

Very dissatisfied

0

1 (4.5)

Importance of nursing research

Very important

9 (40.9)

12 (54.5)

1.55a

0.547

Important

12 (54.5)

10 (45.5)

Neutral

1 (4.5)

0

Not important

0

0

  

Not very important

0

0

  

Average academic performance

≤4.0

2 (9.1)

3 (13.6)

1.48a

0.835

3.5 3.99

9 (40.9)

7 (31.8)

3.0 3.49

11 (50.0)

11 (50.0)

2.5 2.99

0

1 (4.5)

< 2.5

0

0

  

Outcome variables (range of score)

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

t

p value

EBP knowledge (1–5)

3.26 ± 0.40

3.27 ± 0.46

−0.12

0.907

EBP attitudes (1–5)

3.67 ± 0.36

3.79 ± 0.32

−1.15

0.256

EBP competencies (1–5)

3.06 ± 0.48

3.04 ± 0.61

0.14

0.891

Future use of EBP (1–5)

3.83 ± 0.51

3.84 ± 0.55

−0.08

0.936

Critical thinking (1–5)

3.39 ± 0.35

3.35 ± 0.49

0.33

0.744

  1. EBP Evidence Based Practice
  2. a Fisher’s Exact Test