Skip to main content

Table 4 Instruments evaluating SDL abilities: psychometric propertiesa and their methodological quality of evaluationb

From: Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties

Tool

Authors, year

Step 2

Internal Consistency

Reliability

Content Validity

Structural Validity

Hypotheses Testing

Criterion Validity

Cross-Cultural Validity

CTT or IRT

α Cronbach

ICC

Yes

Methods used; main findings

Yes

Tool, r Pearson

p value

Yes

SDLRS

Crook, [11]

–

–

–

–

–

8% variance

++

0.258

p < 0.02

++

–

SDLRSNE

Fisher et al., [32]

–

0.924

++

–

–

PCA; 36.4%

++

–

–

–

Fisher and King, [31]

–

0.87

+

–

–

CFA; Self-management RMSEA = 0.039, GFI = 0.960, GFI-AGFI = 0.023, CFI = 0.971, SRMR = 0.039, Desire for learning RMSEA = 0.024, GFI = 0.971, GFI-AGFI =0.020, CFI = 0.993, SRMR = 0.032, Self-control RMSEA = 0.054, GFI = 0.951, GFI-AGFI = 0.028, CFI = 0.930, SRMR =0.031

++

–

–

–

Fujino-Oyama et al., [3]

–

0.91

++

–

–

CFA; SRMR = 0.097, RMSEA = 95%, CI = 0.081 [0.078,0.085], CFI = 0.654, PGFI =0.673

++

–

–

–

SRSSDL

Williamson, [35]

–

0.71–0.79

+

–

Delphy study

+

Known-groups technique; 1st year scores were 160; final year students’ scores were 214

+

–

–

–

Cadorin et al., [28]

–

0.94

++

0.73

++

–

–

–

–

Forward back-translation

+

Cadorin et al., [29]

–

0.929

+

–

–

EFA; 54.304%

++

–

–

–

Cadorin et al., [30]

–

SRSSDL 0.93

SDLI 0.90

+++

–

–

–

–

SDLI 0.815

p < 0.001

+++

Forward back-translation

+

SDLI

Cheng et al., [24]

–

0.916

++

–

Delphi study

++++

CFA; RMS = 0.04, RMSEA = 0.057, GFI = 0.94, AGFI = 0.92, NFI = 0.93, AIC = 0.76

++

–

–

–

Cheng et al., [33]

++++

0.94

++++

–

–

GRM; discrimination parameter for all items SDLI tool was between 1.41 and 2.99

++++

–

–

–

Shen et al., [34]

–

0.91

++

0.916

++

–

EFA 53.3%; CFA: RMR = 0.028, RMSEA = 0.057, CFI = 0.930, GFI = 0.929, AGFI = 0.909, PGFI = 0.781, NFI = 0.905

++

–

SRSSDL 0.876

p < 0.001

++

–

  1. aMeasurement error (Box C) and Responsiveness (Box I) were not included in the table given that no studies have estimated these psychometric properties
  2. b + poor; ++ fair; +++ good; ++++ excellent
  3. Legend: α Cronbach’s alpha coefficient – Total scale, AGFI Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index, CFA confirmatory factor analysis, CFI comparative fit indices, CI confidence interval, EFA explorative factor analysis, GFI goodness of fit, GRM Graded Response Model, ICC interclass correlation coefficient, IRT Item Response Theory, NFI Normed Fit Index, PCA principal components analysis, PGFI Parsimony Goodness-of-Fit Index, r Pearson’s coefficient, RMR root mean square residual, RMS standardized residual, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, SDLI Self-Directed Learning Instrument, SDLRS Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale, SDLRSNE Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale for Nursing Education, SRMR standardized root mean square residual, SRSSDLI Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning