1. Involving directors | 2. Web-based, professional supportive system | 3. Coordinated training program | 4. National Quality Coordinator | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Directors decide to develop and use a collective QS, and they are involved in the development of the system | Developers design the system in a systematic and thoughtful manner. There is an informative manual, a web-based system for data management, enthusiastic (organizational) support, and clear national deadlines. | Before launch, there is a presentation including a clear explanation of the purpose of the QS. All quality coordinators (QCs) receive training in how to work with the web-based system. The audit commission receives a 1-day professional training. | A national quality coordinator supports the institutes. | |
Stage1. Orientation | There is attention for the system before it is put into use. Those involved know the system is coming. | The presentation and training sessions provide the participants with more insight into the relevance of the system. | ||
Stage 2. Insight | The informative manual will help to prepare the institutes. | QCs are skilled enough. | ||
Stage 3. Acceptance | Increases the credibility and the commitment to the system. | A professional system will enhance the credibility of the system and create confidence. | Expectations and responsibilities are clear. Involving others in the training sessions leads to more support. | |
Stage 4. Change | It is certain that the system will be put into use. | Clear national deadlines ensure that all institutes take the same steps at the same time. In the case of problems, there is support. | QCs are capable of working with the system. | |
Stage 5. Consolidating change | The national quality coordinator supports the institutes with implementing improvement plans. |