Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated regression coefficients for the prediction of trainers’ ‘overallmini-CEX scores, including random effects

From: The influence of students’ prior clinical skills and context characteristics on mini-CEX scores in clerkships – a multilevel analysis

 

Estimated regression coefficients (and 95 % confidence intervals)

Predictor

Single predictors

Multifactorial model

Clinic size

 Small vs. large

−0.25* (-0.48, −0.019)

−0.26* (−0.48, −0.039); DF = 19.3

 Medium vs. large

−0.25 (−0.53, −0.012)

−0.17 (−0.42, 0.077); DF = 17

Trainers’ function

 Resident vs. head of department

0.54*** (0.28, 0.81)

0.55*** (0.26, 0.84); DF = 452

 Senior physician vs. head of department

0.10 (−0.17, 0.37)

0.12 (−0.18, 0.42); DF = 453

Students’ gender

 Male vs. female

−0.09 (−0.21, 0.026)

−0.062 (−0.20, 0.074); DF = 138

Assessment characteristics

 Low vs. high complexity

−0.24* (0.43,0.04)

−0.23* (0.44,0.019); DF = 1049

 Medium vs. high complexity

−0.059 (−0.18, 0.067)

−0.081 (−0.21, 0.052); DF =1015

Students’ clinical skills (OSCE)

 Low vs. high performers

−0.19 (−0.39, 0.014)

−0.15 (−0.36, 0.063); DF = 132

 Medium vs. high performers

−0.15 (−0.29, 0.0021)

−0.13 (−0.28, 0.021); DF = 132

  1. Predictors remaining significant in the multifactorial model are reported in bold
  2. DF degrees of freedom
  3. *p < 0.05
  4. **p < 0.01
  5. ***p < 0.001