Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis of matrix and weight of expertise dimension (panel A), teaching ability dimension (panel B), attitudes and traits dimension (panel C), and beliefs and values dimension (panel D)

From: Constructing core competency indicators for clinical teachers in Taiwan: a qualitative analysis and an analytic hierarchy process

Dimensions

Sub-dimensions

       

A. Expertise

  

F1

F2

  

Weight

Rank

 

Clinical Abilities

F1

1

0.885

  

47%

2

 

Clinical Communication

F2

1.128

1

  

53%

1

CR = 0 < 0.1

B. Teaching Ability

  

F1

F2

F3

F4

Weight

Rank

 

Instructional Design

F1

1

0.865

1.833

1.209

27%

2

 

Teaching Skills

F2

1.154

1

3.592

2.029

39%

1

 

Teaching Material Design

F3

0.545

0.278

1

0.523

12%

4

 

Learning Evaluation

F4

0.826

0.492

1.908

1

22%

3

CR = 0.011 < 0.1

C. Attitudes and Traits

  

F1

F2

F3

 

Weight

Rank

 

Teaching Attitudes

F1

1

2.116

1.986

 

50%

1

 

Professional Growth

F2

0.472

1

0.917

 

24%

3

 

Personality Traits

F3

0.503

1.089

1

 

26%

2

CR = 0 < 0.1

D. Beliefs and Values

  

F1

F2

  

Weight

Rank

 

Teaching Beliefs

F1

1

0.639

  

39%

2

 

Model Teaching

F2

1.564

1

  

61%

1

CR = 0 < 0.1