Table 1 The table shows separately for analyses of hawk-dove differences, male–female differences, White-nonWhite differences, and differences between odd and even numbered candidates (see columns), the numbers of examiners who reached statistical significance (rows) on various criteria
Hawk-Dove | Male–female | White-NonWhite | Odd-Even numbering | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive: Examiner hawkish | Positive: Males score higher than females | Positive: Whites score higher than non-Whites | ||||||
PACES | nPACES | PACES | nPACES | PACES | nPACES | PACES | nPACES | |
Negative effect: P < .05 corrected | 34 (1.9%) | 35 (2.3%) | 0 | 0 | 2 (0.1%) | 1 (0.1%) | 0 | 0 |
Negative effect: P < .05 uncorrected (chance expectation = 2.5%) | 198 (11.1%) | 235 (15.7%) | 73 (4.1%) | 63 (4.2%) | 73 (4.4%) | 48 (3.6%) | 60 (3.2%) | 51 (3.2%) |
Not significant (uncorrected, p > .05) | 1339 (74.8%) | 989 (66.0%) | 1638 (91.5%) | 1379 (92.1%) | 1491 (90.4%) | 1229 (92.2%) | 1680 (93.9%) | 1396 (93.2%) |
Positive effect: P < .05 uncorrected (chance expectation = 2.5%) | 192 (10.7%) | 200 (13.4%) | 79 (4.4%) | 55 (3.7%) | 82 (5.0%) | 55 (4.1%) | 50 (3.0%) | 51 (3.6%) |
Positive effect: P < .05 corrected | 27 (1.5%) | 39 (2.6%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.1%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N examiners | 1790 | 1498 | 1790 | 1497 | 1649 | 1333 | 1790 | 1498 |